Camau cyfreithiol
Protecting the right of disabled people to stay in their own home (2)
Wedi ei gyhoeddi: 1 Tachwedd 2019
Diweddarwyd diwethaf: 21 Chwefror 2022
Manylion yr achos
Nodwedd warchodedig | Anabledd |
---|---|
Mathau o hawliadau cydraddoldeb | Other |
Llys neu dribiwnlys | Uchel Lys (Llys Gweinyddol) |
Cyflwr yr achos | Wedi gorffen |
Ein cyfranogiad | Adolygiad barnwrol gan y Comisiwn Cydraddoldeb a Hawliau Dynol (adran 30 o Ddeddf Cydraddoldeb 2006) |
Canlyniad | Arall |
Meysydd o fywyd | Iechyd |
Gyfraith Hawliau Dynol | Erthygl 8: Parch at eich bywyd preifat a theuluol, eich cartref a gohebiaeth |
Fframwaith rhyngwladol | Confensiwn ar Hawliau Pobl ag Anableddau a'i Brotocol Dewisol (CRPD) |
Enw achos: EHRC v a Clinical Commissioning Group
NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are responsible for planning and commissioning healthcare in their local areas. This CCG had a policy which limited spending on continuing healthcare. It meant that disabled people with ongoing health needs risked being moved from their homes into residential care against their wishes. We believe this breached human rights laws and began legal proceedings against the CCG.
Mater cyfreithiol
Is the Clinical Commissioning Group’s policy on restricting the cost of continuing health care lawful?
Cefndir
NHS continuing healthcare policies in operation at a Clinical Commissioning Group had capped the amount of money available for continuing healthcare. It risked disabled people with substantial ongoing health needs being moved from their homes into residential care against their wishes. We believe this would breach their rights under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act – the right to personal and family life – as well as the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We also think it breaks equality laws. We wrote to the CCG advising that we were beginning Judicial Review proceedings that would challenge their continuing healthcare policies.
Pam roedden ni'n cymryd rhan
It is our duty to uphold the Human Rights Act and we were concerned that this CCG had put costs above the human rights of disabled people. Our aim in beginning a Judicial Review was to make sure the discriminatory policy was changed and that in future the CCG would be mindful of the need to ensure cost-cutting doesn’t lead to human rights breaches.
Beth wnaethom ni
We wrote to the CCG advising them we were beginning Judicial Review proceedings. We began work with the CCG in November 2019 and, as with other CCGs, initially worked towards reaching an agreement without formal legal action. Having exhausted all avenues, we formally began legal proceedings.
Beth ddigwyddodd
After legal proceedings had begun, the CCG agreed to review their continuing healthcare policy. This was due to start during the summer of 2019. We will work with the CCG to make sure that their revised policy is lawful.
Pwy fydd yn elwa
The action we took has protected the rights of disabled people with significant ongoing healthcare issues. This group of people will be better protected from moves that they don’t want. We also know that thanks to the publicity surrounding our action, CCGs and other public bodies involved in care will in future give more consideration to human rights and equality laws when designing policies.
Dyddiad y gwrandawiad
Dyddiad dod i ben
Diweddariadau tudalennau
Cyhoeddwyd
1 Tachwedd 2019
Diweddarwyd diwethaf
21 Chwefror 2022