Legal action
Protecting the right of disabled people to stay in their own home (2)
Published: 1 November 2019
Last updated: 21 February 2022
Case details
Protected Characteristic | Disability |
---|---|
Types of equality claim | Other |
Court or tribunal | High Court (Admin Court) |
Case state | Concluded |
Our involvement | Judicial review by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (section 30 of the Equality Act 2006) |
Outcome | Other |
Areas of life | Health |
Human Rights law | Article 8: Respect for your private and family life, home and correspondence |
International framework | Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) |
Case name: EHRC v a Clinical Commissioning Group
NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are responsible for planning and commissioning healthcare in their local areas. This CCG had a policy which limited spending on continuing healthcare. It meant that disabled people with ongoing health needs risked being moved from their homes into residential care against their wishes. We believe this breached human rights laws and began legal proceedings against the CCG.
Legal issue
Is the Clinical Commissioning Group’s policy on restricting the cost of continuing health care lawful?
Background
NHS continuing healthcare policies in operation at a Clinical Commissioning Group had capped the amount of money available for continuing healthcare. It risked disabled people with substantial ongoing health needs being moved from their homes into residential care against their wishes. We believe this would breach their rights under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act – the right to personal and family life – as well as the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We also think it breaks equality laws. We wrote to the CCG advising that we were beginning Judicial Review proceedings that would challenge their continuing healthcare policies.
Why we were involved
It is our duty to uphold the Human Rights Act and we were concerned that this CCG had put costs above the human rights of disabled people. Our aim in beginning a Judicial Review was to make sure the discriminatory policy was changed and that in future the CCG would be mindful of the need to ensure cost-cutting doesn’t lead to human rights breaches.
What we did
We wrote to the CCG advising them we were beginning Judicial Review proceedings. We began work with the CCG in November 2019 and, as with other CCGs, initially worked towards reaching an agreement without formal legal action. Having exhausted all avenues, we formally began legal proceedings.
What happened
After legal proceedings had begun, the CCG agreed to review their continuing healthcare policy. This was due to start during the summer of 2019. We will work with the CCG to make sure that their revised policy is lawful.
Who will benefit
The action we took has protected the rights of disabled people with significant ongoing healthcare issues. This group of people will be better protected from moves that they don’t want. We also know that thanks to the publicity surrounding our action, CCGs and other public bodies involved in care will in future give more consideration to human rights and equality laws when designing policies.
Date of hearing
Date concluded
Page updates
Published:
1 November 2019
Last updated:
21 February 2022