Camau cyfreithiol

Establishing time limits for pregnancy discrimination claims

Wedi ei gyhoeddi: 31 Gorffenaf 2018

Diweddarwyd diwethaf: 31 Gorffenaf 2018

I ba wledydd mae hyn yn berthnasol?

Manylion yr achos

Nodwedd warchodedig Beichiogrwydd a mamolaeth
Mathau o hawliadau cydraddoldeb Gwahaniaethu uniongyrchol
Llys neu dribiwnlys Tribiwnlys Apeliadau Cyflogaeth
Rhaid dilyn y penderfyniad i mewn Lloegr, Alban, Cymru
Mae'r gyfraith yn berthnasol i Lloegr, Alban, Cymru
Cyflwr yr achos Wedi gorffen
Ein cyfranogiad Cymorth cyfreithiol (adran 28 o Ddeddf Cydraddoldeb 2006)
Canlyniad Setliad
Meysydd o fywyd Gwaith

Enw achos: Thompson v Ark Schools

A woman believed the company she worked for had unlawfully discriminated against her when she was pregnant. However, she did not find out that she could make a legal claim until after the three-month time limit. The Employment Tribunal did not agree to hear her case as she had not made a claim within three months, but the Employment Appeal Tribunal later ruled that the original decision should be retaken by a different Employment Tribunal.

Mater cyfreithiol

Did the Employment Tribunal make a safe decision about whether to extend the time limit for lodging a discrimination claim?

Cefndir

A woman was offered a management job working for a company. When she found out she was pregnant, she asked for the start date to be delayed.

The company then withdrew the job offer. The woman had a difficult pregnancy and also suffered with anxiety and depression.

She only learned that she could make a claim for unlawful pregnancy and maternity discrimination after the three-month time limit for claiming had passed.

The woman followed legal advice and made a claim, asking the Employment Tribunal to use its discretion about the time limit.

However, the Employment Tribunal judge decided that the time limit should not be extended so her case was not heard. The woman then appealed against this decision.

Pam roedden ni'n cymryd rhan

It is vital to recognise that women in this position may be experiencing physical and emotional difficulties that make it hard to comply with the three-month limit.

Our legal powers allow us to bring our own cases and to support other cases that could strengthen equality and human rights laws. In this case, we provided legal help by helping to fund the woman’s case.

Beth wnaethom ni

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in August 2018 ruled in the woman’s favour.

Beth ddigwyddodd

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in July 2018 ruled in the woman’s favour.

The judge stated that the Employment Tribunal’s decision was based on a misunderstanding of the timings of the case, including when she had begun to seek legal advice.

Her claim was sent to be considered at another Employment Tribunal.

Pwy fydd yn elwa

The judgment of the EAT highlights that tribunals should take great care in considering all the facts when they deal with applications to extend the normal time limits. The case will help to raise public awareness of the issue of time limits for discrimination claims for new and expectant mothers.

Dyddiad y gwrandawiad

31 Gorffenaf 2018

Dyddiad dod i ben

31 Gorffenaf 2018

Diweddariadau tudalennau

Advice and support

If you think you might have been treated unfairly and want further advice, you can contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS).

The EASS is an independent advice service, not operated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Phone: 0808 800 0082
 

Or email using the contact form on the EASS website.
phone icon

Call the EASS on:

0808 800 0082