Camau cyfreithiol
Protecting a peaceful protester's right to privacy
Wedi ei gyhoeddi: 24 Ionawr 2019
Diweddarwyd diwethaf: 24 Ionawr 2019
I ba wledydd mae hyn yn berthnasol?
Manylion yr achos
| Nodwedd warchodedig | Crefydd neu gred |
|---|---|
| Mathau o hawliadau cydraddoldeb | Other |
| Llys neu dribiwnlys | Llys Hawliau Dynol Ewrop |
| Rhaid dilyn y penderfyniad i mewn | Lloegr, Alban, Cymru |
| Mae'r gyfraith yn berthnasol i | Lloegr, Alban, Cymru |
| Cyflwr yr achos | Wedi gorffen |
| Ein cyfranogiad | Ymyrraeth (adran 30 o Ddeddf Cydraddoldeb 2006) |
| Canlyniad | Barn |
| Meysydd o fywyd | Cyfiawnder a diogelwch personol |
| Gyfraith Hawliau Dynol | Erthygl 8: Parch at eich bywyd preifat a theuluol, eich cartref a gohebiaeth |
| Fframwaith rhyngwladol | Cyfamod Rhyngwladol ar Hawliau Sifil a Gwleidyddol (ICCPR) |
Enw achos: Catt v UK
Mr Catt was 94 years old and of good character. He has no criminal record and is not suspected of any criminality. He challenged the retention of data by the Police on the National Domestic Extremism Database relating to his peaceful and lawful attendance at various political protests.
Mater cyfreithiol
Is it lawful for the police to hold information on an extremism database about individuals who have done nothing wrong, and if so, whether the safeguards in the present scheme are adequate?
Pam roedden ni'n cymryd rhan
This case came under our core priority aim of upholding the system of equality and human rights protections.
Beth wnaethom ni
We intervened in the European Court of Human Rights.
Beth ddigwyddodd
Our intervention helped secure a ruling that holding Mr Catt's details was unlawful.
Pwy fydd yn elwa
The ruling means that the Police need to exercise caution when retaining the details of an individual
Dyddiad y gwrandawiad
Dyddiad dod i ben
Diweddariadau tudalennau
Cyhoeddwyd
24 Ionawr 2019
Diweddarwyd diwethaf
24 Ionawr 2019
