Legal action
Protecting equal access to education for all pupils
Published: 11 July 2017
Last updated: 13 October 2017
Case details
Protected Characteristic | Sex |
---|---|
Types of equality claim | Other |
Court or tribunal | Court of Appeal (Civil) |
Case state | Concluded |
Our involvement | Intervention (section 30 of the Equality Act 2006) |
Outcome | Judgment |
Case name: Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills v The Interim Executive Board of Al-Hijrah School
Legal issue
Was the segregation of pupils unlawful sex discrimination?
Background
The school is a voluntary aided faith school for boys and girls aged between 4 and 16. It has an Islamic ethos and, for religious reasons, believes that separation of boys and girls is mandated, from Year 5 onwards. It brought a judicial review to challenge an OFSTED report rating it inadequate. The school’s policy of segregating pupils was central to that rating. The school argued that segregation was not unlawful sex discrimination as the male and female pupils were receiving parallel but equal education provision. OFSTED argued that the segregation was itself less favourable treatment of both boys and girls.
Why we were involved
We work to make sure the education system promotes good relations with others and respect for equality and human rights.
What we did
We intervened using our powers under s30 Equality Act 2006.
What happened
The Court of Appeal confirmed that completely segregating girls and boys at a school is unlawful sex discrimination. The decision reflected the position set out in our intervention submissions.
Who will benefit
The case confirms that complete segregation of girls and boys in schools is only allowed when schools comply with the single sex schools provisions in the Equality Act.
Date of hearing
Date concluded
Page updates
Published:
11 July 2017
Last updated:
13 October 2017